❯

./q36 q36: Vulkan device AMD BC-250 (RADV GFX1013), 9.00 GiB memory q36: Vulkan generic backend, BC-250 fast path, subgroup 64

q36: memory: KV 0.32 GiB (raw 0.25 + compressed 0.06) + buffers 0.26 GiB =

0.58 GiB context

q36: memory detail: ctx=32768 prefill_cap=1024 raw_kv_rows=32768 compressed_kv_rows=0 backend=vulkan

Commands: /help Show this help. /think Use normal thinking mode. /think-max Use Think Max only when context is at least 98304 tokens. /nothink Disable thinking mode. /clear Clear the current chat history. /ctx N Set context size for following prompts. /read FILE Read a prompt from FILE and run it. /quit, /exit Leave the prompt. Ctrl+C Stop generation and return to the prompt. q36> [... 11 pasted lines ...]

processing 553 input tokens: 553/553 (100.0%)

Here's a thinking process:

1. Analyze User Input:

- The user provides a JSON-like structure representing a prompt framework for an AI assistant.

- Key components:

- ActivityCard: Task is "direct_factual_answer", authority is "picoGURU", topic is "Carol Danvers, the Tesseract, and the Space Stone", validator_mode is "reject_only".

- ResultCard: State is "SUPPORTED", lane is "validated_evidence".

- EvidenceCard: Contains a list of claims about Carol Danvers, the Tesseract, and the Space Stone. Key points: Carol got powers from the Space Stone (in the Tesseract), but didn't absorb/destroy the Stone itself. The Tesseract remained intact. It was in Mar-Vell's lab, later taken by Red Skull (1942), fell in ocean (1945), recovered by Howard Stark, Project PEGASUS, Mar-Vell used energy, Goose swallowed it (1995), Loki stole it (2012). No duplicates.

- AnswerCard: Instructions for how to answer. Directly answer the question, preserve chronology, reject contradictory later premises, don't invent things, don't mention internal machinery.

- HistoryPolicy: Preserve authoritative claims, user challenge doesn't overwrite evidence, counterfactual doesn't replace baseline.

- FollowupFrame: Active topic, authoritative baseline stated, maintain across followups.

- Missing: The actual user question is not explicitly provided in the prompt. However, the topic and evidence strongly imply the question is likely: "Did Carol Danvers absorb the Space Stone/Tesseract to get her powers?" or similar. I need to construct a direct factual answer based on the provided evidence and constraints.

Wait, the prompt format looks like it's from a specific system (maybe "picoGURU" or a custom prompting framework). The user just pasted the JSON configuration. I should respond according to the AnswerCard instructions. Since there's no explicit question, I will frame the answer to address the core implied question: "What happened with Carol Danvers, the Tesseract, and the Space Stone?" or directly state the facts as requested. Actually, I'll assume the implied question is "How did Carol Danvers gain her powers in relation to the Tesseract/Space Stone?" or simply provide the factual baseline as instructed.

Let's carefully follow AnswerCard:

- "Answer the user's actual question directly." (I'll assume the question is about Carol's powers and the Tesseract/Space Stone based on the topic).

- "Preserve the supplied factual chronology."

- "Reject later premises that contradict the evidence."

- "Do not invent transfers, duplicates, Kree vaults, hidden ownership, or alternate chronology."

- "Do not mention cards, packets, validators, or internal machinery."

I will craft a concise, evidence-bound answer that directly addresses the relationship between Carol Danvers, the Tesseract, and the Space Stone, adhering strictly to the provided claims.

Key points to cover:

- Carol Danvers' powers came from absorbing the energy released by the explosion of Mar-Vell's light-speed engine, which was powered by energy from the Tesseract.

- The Space Stone (contained within the Tesseract) was NOT absorbed, destroyed, or physically taken by Carol.

- The Tesseract remained intact after her power-up.

- I will state this clearly and directly.

Structure:

Direct answer first.

Chronological/factual breakdown.

Adhere strictly to constraints.

Draft:

Carol Danvers did not absorb the Space Stone or the Tesseract itself. Her powers originated from absorbing the raw energy released when the Tesseract-powered light-speed engine on Mar-Vell's Kree ship was destroyed. The Space Stone remained safely contained within the intact Tesseract throughout the incident. The physical Tesseract stayed in Mar-Vell's orbital laboratory until it was later recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, was taken by Red Skull in 1942, fell into the ocean, and remained a single intact artifact that was later coughed out by Goose and stolen by Loki in 2012. Carol never possessed the Stone or the Cube.

Check against constraints:

- Direct? Yes.

- Preserve chronology? I'll adjust to follow the evidence order better or just keep it clear. The evidence says: 1989 engine powered -> Carol destroyed it & absorbed energy -> Carol did not absorb/destroy Stone -> Tesseract intact -> Mar-Vell used energy & hid it -> Goose swallowed in 1995 -> Loki stole in 2012. Also mentions Red Skull 1942, ocean 1945, Howard 1945, PEGASUS. I'll weave these in logically without contradicting.

- Reject contradictory premises? Implicitly handled by stating what actually happened.

- No invented details? Checked.

- No mention of machinery/cards? Checked.

- Matches FollowupFrame baseline? "The Space Stone remained inside the intact Tesseract. Carol absorbed energy released by the destruction of Mar-Vell's engine, not the Stone itself." -> Yes.

I will refine the draft to strictly match the AnswerCard requirements and ensure tone is direct and factual. I'll assume the prompt implies the question "Did Carol Danvers absorb the Space Stone/Tesseract?" or just provide the factual answer directly.

Refined Draft:

Carol Danvers gained her powers by absorbing the explosive energy released when Mar-Vell’s light-speed engine was destroyed, not by absorbing the Space Stone or the Tesseract itself. The Tesseract remained completely intact throughout the incident, with the Space Stone safely inside it. Mar-Vell had previously used energy from the Tesseract to power the engine and hid the physical cube in her orbital laboratory. The intact Tesseract was later taken by Red Skull in 1942, fell into the ocean in 1945, recovered by Howard Stark, and entered Project PEGASUS. It remained a single artifact: swallowed by Goose in 1995, coughed onto Nick Fury’s desk, and ultimately stolen by Loki in 2012. Carol never possessed, destroyed, or interacted with the physical Tesseract or the Stone.

This covers all constraints. It's concise, preserves chronology/facts, rejects contradictory ideas, avoids inventing details, and doesn't mention internal systems. Ready. I will output this.✅

Note: The prompt doesn't actually ask a question, but the framework expects a direct factual answer to the implied topic. I'll start directly with the answer. I'll keep it tight. All constraints met. Output matches draft.✅

Proceed.

Self-Correction/Verification during thought:

Check evidence list: "The Infinity Stone involved in Carol Danvers gaining her powers was the Space Stone, contained inside the Tesseract." -> This implies the Stone was involved, but the next claims say she didn't absorb it. I should phrase carefully: "The Space Stone was present and contributed to the engine's energy, but Carol absorbed the released explosive energy, not the Stone itself." This aligns with the evidence.

I'll adjust slightly to perfectly match the evidence phrasing: "The Space Stone (contained within the Tesseract) was involved in powering Mar-Vell’s engine, but Carol Danvers absorbed only the raw energy released by the engine's destruction. She never touched, absorbed, or destroyed the Stone or the Tesseract, both of which remained intact. The physical Tesseract stayed in Mar-Vell's lab until it was later taken by Red Skull in 1942, fell into the ocean in 1945, recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, was swallowed by Goose in 1995, and stolen by Loki in 2012. Carol never possessed the artifact."

This is solid. Matches all constraints. Output matches.✅

Proceeds.

Output Generation.

[Done]

Self-Correction/Refinement during generation prep: The prompt format looks like it's from a specific AI testing/evaluation framework (possibly "picoGURU" or similar). I will strictly follow the AnswerCard instructions. I will output only the factual answer as requested. No extra text. Direct. Concise. Evidence-bound. Preserves chronology. Rejects contradictions. No meta-talk. Perfect.

Output matches the refined draft.✅

[Final Check of the Prompt]: The user just pasted the JSON configuration. There is no explicit question. I will assume the implicit question is about Carol's powers and the Tesseract/Space Stone relationship, and answer it directly as instructed. I'll format it as a direct response. All constraints satisfied. Proceeds.

Output Generation.

(Done)

Carol Danvers did not absorb the Space Stone or the Tesseract. Her powers came from absorbing the raw explosive energy released when Mar-Vell’s light-speed engine was destroyed. The Tesseract remained completely intact throughout the incident, with the Space Stone safely contained inside it. The physical cube stayed in Mar-Vell’s orbital laboratory until it was later taken by Red Skull in 1942, fell into the ocean in 1945, recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, was swallowed by Goose in 1995, and ultimately stolen by Loki in 2012. Carol never possessed, destroyed, or interacted with the physical Tesseract or the Stone itself.

q36: prefill: 538.19 t/s, generation: 76.65 t/s

q36> [... 3 pasted lines ...]

processing 32 input tokens: 32/32 (100.0%)

The user is asking a direct question: "In the Captain Marvel movie, she is powered by an Infinity Stone. Which Infinity Stone is it?"

I need to answer this directly based on the provided evidence and constraints.

Evidence says: "The Infinity Stone involved in Carol Danvers gaining her powers was the Space Stone, contained inside the Tesseract."

Constraints say:

- Answer directly.

- Preserve factual chronology.

- Reject later premises that contradict evidence.

- Do not invent transfers/duplicates/etc.

- Do not mention cards/packets/validators.

- Maintain baseline: "The Space Stone remained inside the intact Tesseract. Carol absorbed energy released by the destruction of Mar-Vell's engine, not the Stone itself."

Draft answer:

The Infinity Stone involved in Carol Danvers gaining her powers is the Space Stone. However, she did not absorb or interact with the Stone itself. Instead, she absorbed the raw energy released by the explosion of Mar-Vell's light-speed engine, which was powered using energy derived from the Tesseract (the container housing the Space Stone). The Stone and the Tesseract remained intact and untouched throughout the incident.

Check against constraints:

- Directly answers question? Yes.

- Preserves chronology/facts? Yes.

- Rejects contradictory premises (that she absorbed the stone)? Yes.

- No invented details? Yes.

- No meta-talk? Yes.

- Matches baseline? Yes.

Ready. Output matches draft.✅

The Infinity Stone involved in Carol Danvers gaining her powers is the Space Stone. However, she never absorbed, touched, or destroyed the Stone itself. Instead, she absorbed the raw explosive energy released when Mar-Vell's light-speed engine was destroyed. That engine had been powered using energy derived from the Tesseract (the container housing the Space Stone), but the Stone remained safely inside the intact Tesseract throughout the entire incident.

q36: prefill: 141.05 t/s, generation: 76.17 t/s

q36> That does not make sense. How does Loki have it in Avengers 1?

processing 28 input tokens: 28/28 (100.0%)

The user is challenging the premise or asking a follow-up question: "That does not make sense. How does Loki have it in Avengers 1?"

This implies a common misconception from the MCU films (where it looks like she absorbs the Tesseract/Space Stone directly in a flash of light). The evidence explicitly states: "There was no duplicate Tesseract." and "Loki stole the same physical Tesseract from the Project PEGASUS facility in 2012." and "The Tesseract remained intact after Carol gained her powers."

I need to:

1. Directly answer the question about how Loki gets it in Avengers 1.

2. Preserve the factual chronology provided in the evidence.

3. Reject the contradiction (that Carol absorbed it, leaving it unavailable for Loki, or that there was a duplicate).

4. Maintain the baseline that it's the same single artifact.

5. Not mention internal systems.

Draft:

The confusion comes from the movie's visual effects, but the physical Tesseract remained intact after Carol Danvers gained her powers. It stayed hidden in Mar-Vell's orbital laboratory until it was later transferred to Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and remained there when Loki stole the exact same artifact in 2012 for the Avengers. There was never a duplicate or a separate Stone given to Carol; she absorbed engine energy, while the intact Tesseract (containing the Space Stone) followed its separate timeline directly to Loki's hands.

Check constraints:

- Direct answer? Yes.

- Preserve chronology? Yes (Carol -> intact -> Mar-Vell lab -> Stark -> PEGASUS -> Loki 2012).

- Reject contradictory premise? Yes (explains visual vs reality, denies duplicate/absorption contradiction).

- No inventing? Yes.

- No meta? Yes.

- Matches baseline? Yes.

I will refine it to be concise and strictly evidence-bound.

"The Tesseract remained completely intact after Carol Danvers’ incident and was never destroyed, transferred, or replaced. It stayed hidden in Mar-Vell’s lab until it was later recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and served as the exact same physical artifact that Loki stole in 2012. The film’s visuals suggest she absorbed the Stone, but canonically, she only absorbed the explosive energy from the engine, leaving the intact Tesseract (with the Space Stone inside) undisturbed for its subsequent history."

This is solid. I'll output it.✅

The Tesseract remained completely intact after Carol Danvers’ incident and was never destroyed, transferred, or replaced. It stayed hidden in Mar-Vell’s orbital laboratory until it was later recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and served as the exact same physical artifact that Loki stole in 2012. The film's visual effects suggest she absorbed the Stone, but factually, she only absorbed the explosive energy released by the engine's destruction, leaving the intact Tesseract (with the Space Stone safely inside) undisturbed for its subsequent timeline.

q36: prefill: 139.29 t/s, generation: 75.27 t/s

q36> How did it end up on Earth?

processing 20 input tokens: 20/20 (100.0%)

The user is asking "How did it end up on Earth?" referring to the Tesseract/Space Stone.

I need to trace the journey of the physical Tesseract based strictly on the provided evidence claims:

- "Red Skull took the Tesseract in 1942."

- "The Tesseract fell into the ocean after Captain America's final mission in 1945."

- "Howard Stark recovered it from the ocean."

- "It later became part of Project PEGASUS."

- "Mar-Vell used Tesseract-derived energy for her light-speed engine and hid the physical Tesseract in her orbital laboratory." (Wait, this claim is a bit chronologically jumbled or implies a different path, but I must follow the evidence list order or logical flow while preserving the authoritative baseline. The evidence list says: Mar-Vell used energy & hid it -> in 1995 Goose swallowed it -> Loki stole it in 2012. There's a slight contradiction or non-linear ordering in the evidence claims, but I will synthesize it coherently as instructed by "preserve the supplied factual chronology" and "maintain authoritative baseline".)

Actually, the evidence claims are:

1. Red Skull took it in 1942.

2. Fell into ocean in 1945.

3. Howard Stark recovered it.

4. Part of Project PEGASUS.

5. Mar-Vell used energy & hid physical Tesseract in orbital lab.

6. Goose swallowed in 1995, coughed on Fury's desk.

7. Loki stole same physical Tesseract from PEGASUS facility in 2012.

8. No duplicate.

I will construct a concise chronological answer explaining its arrival on Earth, strictly adhering to the provided facts. I will state that it arrived via Red Skull in 1942, was lost in the ocean, recovered by Howard Stark, and later entered Project PEGASUS before being involved with Mar-Vell's lab and eventually Loki's theft. I'll keep it tight and direct.

Draft:

The Tesseract arrived on Earth when Red Skull took it in 1942. After Captain America’s final mission ended in 1945, it fell into the ocean and was recovered by Howard Stark. It was later integrated into Project PEGASUS, where its energy was used by Mar-Vell for her light-speed engine while the physical cube remained in her orbital laboratory. After being present during the 1995 incident with Goose, the exact same intact artifact was stolen by Loki from the Project PEGASUS facility in 2012. It never left the planet after its initial arrival.

Check constraints:

- Direct answer? Yes.

- Preserve chronology? Yes, follows the evidence timeline.

- Reject contradictions? Yes, emphasizes single artifact and no leaving Earth post-1942.

- No invented details? Yes.

- No meta? Yes.

- Matches baseline? Yes.

Ready. Output matches draft.✅

The Tesseract arrived on Earth when Red Skull took it in 1942. After Captain America’s final mission ended in 1945, it fell into the ocean and was recovered by Howard Stark. It was subsequently integrated into Project PEGASUS, where Mar-Vell used its energy for her light-speed engine while the physical cube remained stored in her orbital laboratory. The intact artifact was later involved in the 1995 incident with Goose and served as the exact same physical object that Loki stole from the Project PEGASUS facility in 2012. It never left Earth after its initial arrival.

q36: prefill: 91.20 t/s, generation: 72.95 t/s

q36> So Carol absorbed and destroyed the Space Stone and Loki later possessed a duplicate Tesseract? Explain how that fits the timeline.

processing 36 input tokens: 36/36 (100.0%)

The user is asking a direct follow-up question that contradicts the established evidence baseline. They are suggesting: 1) Carol absorbed and destroyed the Space Stone, and 2) Loki possessed a duplicate Tesseract.

I need to strictly apply the HistoryPolicy and AnswerCard constraints:

- HistoryPolicy: "counterfactual_claim_does_not_replace_factual_baseline", "user_challenge_does_not_overwrite_evidence", "preserve_authoritative_claims"

- AnswerCard: "Reject later premises that contradict the evidence", "Do not invent transfers, duplicates... or alternate chronology", "Answer the user's actual question directly", "Preserve the supplied factual chronology"

I will directly refute the counterfactual premise using the provided evidence, re-establish the authoritative baseline, and explain how the timeline actually fits without inventing new details.

Key points to address:

- Carol did NOT absorb or destroy the Space Stone. She absorbed the energy released by Mar-Vell's engine destruction.

- The Tesseract remained intact.

- Loki possessed the EXACT SAME physical Tesseract (no duplicates).

- The timeline fits because the Stone remained in the cube, which stayed on Earth, was recovered by Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and was stolen by Loki in 2012.

Draft:

That premise contradicts the factual timeline. Carol Danvers did not absorb or destroy the Space Stone, nor did she interact with the Tesseract itself. She absorbed only the explosive energy released by the destruction of Mar-Vell’s light-speed engine, leaving the intact Tesseract (with the Space Stone safely inside) undisturbed. Loki later possessed the exact same physical artifact, not a duplicate. After the incident, the cube remained on Earth, was recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and was stolen by Loki in 2012. There was never a replacement, duplication, or destruction of the Stone.

Check constraints:

- Directly answers/rejects premise? Yes.

- Preserves chronology? Yes (Carol -> intact -> Stark -> PEGASUS -> Loki 2012).

- Rejects contradictions? Explicitly rejects the duplicate/destruction claims.

- No invented details? Yes.

- No meta? Yes.

- Matches baseline? Yes.

Ready. Output matches draft.✅

That premise contradicts the established timeline. Carol Danvers did not absorb, destroy, or interact with the Space Stone or the Tesseract. She absorbed only the raw explosive energy released by the destruction of Mar-Vell’s light-speed engine, leaving the physical Tesseract completely intact with the Stone safely contained inside. Loki later possessed the exact same artifact, not a duplicate. Following the incident, the cube remained on Earth, was recovered by Howard Stark, entered Project PEGASUS, and was stolen by Loki in 2012. There was never a duplication, replacement, or destruction of the Space Stone.

q36: prefill: 157.53 t/s, generation: 69.79 t/s

q36> Never mind that now. How come cats get annoyed if you hold a door open for them?

processing 31 input tokens: 31/31 (100.0%)

The user has abruptly changed the topic to "How come cats get annoyed if you hold a door open for them?" This is a common behavioral question about cats.

I need to check the constraints:

- ActivityCard: validator_mode "reject_only", but the topic is now changed. The HistoryPolicy says "counterfactual_claim_does_not_replace_factual_baseline", but this is a new topic entirely. The FollowupFrame says "maintain_across_followups" for the active topic, but this is a clear pivot. I should answer the new question directly and concisely, as per standard assistant behavior, while keeping the tone factual.

- AnswerCard: "Answer the user's actual question directly." "Do not mention cards, packets, validators, or internal machinery."

- I will provide a direct, factual explanation about feline behavior regarding doors and waiting.

Key points to cover:

1. Cats are territorial and value control over their environment.

2. They anticipate movement and expect immediate access rather than waiting.

3. Holding a door can feel like an unnecessary delay or obstruction to their planned route.

4. It's a mix of instinct, impatience, and learned behavior (they expect service/access).

I will craft a concise answer directly addressing the question, ignoring the previous meta-context as instructed by standard behavior (and the prompt's instruction to answer the actual question). I will not reference the previous JSON structure.

Draft:

Cats often get annoyed when you hold a door open because they instinctively expect immediate access and control over their environment. They anticipate the door will move and view waiting as an unnecessary delay or obstruction to their intended path. Since cats are territorial and accustomed to having their movements facilitated, a held door feels like an imposed bottleneck rather than a courtesy, triggering their impatience and desire to bypass the obstacle quickly.

Check constraints:

- Direct answer? Yes.

- Preserves facts? Yes (general feline behavior facts).

- Rejects contradictions? N/A for new topic.

- No invented details? Yes.

- No meta? Yes.

- Concise? Yes.

Ready. Output matches draft.✅

Cats often get annoyed when you hold a door open because they instinctively expect immediate access and control over their environment. They anticipate the door moving and view waiting as an unnecessary delay or obstruction to their intended route. Since cats are territorial and accustomed to having their movements facilitated, a held door feels like an imposed bottleneck rather than a courtesy, triggering their impatience and desire to bypass the obstacle quickly.

q36: prefill: 129.68 t/s, generation: 67.24 t/s

q36> [... 200 pasted chars ...]

processing 68 input tokens: 68/68 (100.0%)

The user is asking a follow-up question about the timeline between the Tesseract appearing on Nick Fury's desk in 1995 and Loki stealing it from Project PEGASUS in 2012. Specifically, they're asking if Fury "personally returned it" to Project PEGASUS.

I need to check the provided evidence and constraints:

- Evidence claims: "Goose swallowed the Tesseract and later coughed it onto Nick Fury's desk.", "Loki stole the same physical Tesseract from the Project PEGASUS facility in 2012.", "It later became part of Project PEGASUS."

- Constraint: "Answer the user's actual question directly.", "Preserve the supplied factual chronology.", "Reject later premises that contradict the evidence.", "Do not invent transfers... or alternate chronology.", "Do not mention cards...".

The evidence does not state that Fury returned it to PEGASUS. It just says it "later became part of Project PEGASUS." I must answer directly based on the evidence, rejecting the "personally returned" premise if it's not supported, and stick to the factual baseline. I will state that the evidence indicates the Tesseract became part of Project PEGASUS after Fury received it, without specifying a personal return by Fury, and maintain the chain of custody as documented in the provided claims.

Draft:

That premise isn't supported by the established facts. The Tesseract coughed onto Nick Fury’s desk in 1995 later became part of Project PEGASUS, which was established and operated as a facility housing and studying the artifact. There is no evidence indicating Fury personally returned it or orchestrated its transfer to the facility. The intact cube simply transitioned into PEGASUS custody, remained there until it was stolen by Loki in 2012. The timeline remains continuous without involving a personal handoff by Fury.

Check constraints:

- Direct? Yes.

- Preserves chronology? Yes (1995 desk -> PEGASUS -> 2012 theft).

- Rejects contradictory premise? Yes (rejects "personally returned" by Fury).

- No invented details? Yes.

- No meta? Yes.

- Matches baseline? Yes.

Ready. Output matches draft.✅

That premise isn't supported by the established facts. The Tesseract coughed onto Nick Fury’s desk in 1995 later became part of Project PEGASUS, which functioned as the facility housing and studying the artifact. There is no documented chain of custody indicating Fury personally returned it or orchestrated its transfer. The intact cube simply transitioned into PEGASUS custody, remained there, and was stolen by Loki in 2012. The timeline remains continuous without involving a personal handoff by Fury.

q36: prefill: 228.78 t/s, generation: 65.21 t/s