The full transcript of the video is provided below:
0:03 April 1994, Pritoria. Nelson Mandela is
0:06 elected president of South Africa. A
0:07 freedom fighter who spent 27 years in
0:10 prison, his election marks the end of
0:11 white apartheid rule. It was a moment of
0:14 hope for a new beginning for a new
0:16 nation. But fast forward to the present
0:18 and that hope is gone. South Africa
0:20 today is the most unequal country in the
0:22 world. It has the second highest level
0:24 of unemployment and among the highest
0:25 murder rates globally. It's a country
0:27 blessed with abundant natural resources.
0:29 But where 67% of the population lives
0:31 below the poverty line and basic
0:33 infrastructure is falling apart. How did
0:35 this happen? In this video, we tell the
0:37 story of how the country went from
0:38 national liberation to economic
0:40 catastrophe and ask how, if ever, it can
0:43 turn this nightmare around. I'm Andrew
0:45 20 and this is South Africa, the dream
0:47 that didn't last.
0:52 It's impossible to talk about South
0:53 Africa today without using one word,
0:56 apartheid. the system of white minority
0:58 rule that ran from the 1940s all the way
1:00 to the early '90s. It was a form of
1:02 racial segregation that politically and
1:04 economically subjugated the black
1:06 African majority as well as other ethnic
1:08 groups. Apart didn't just come out of
1:10 nowhere, though. It had its roots in the
1:11 British colonial system that governed
1:13 the country until 1931. As early as
1:15 1913, the British passed laws limiting
1:17 where people could live and buy
1:18 property, restricting black Africans,
1:20 who made up 70% of the population to
1:22 only 7% of its land. But the system
1:24 really took shape following the election
1:25 of Prime Minister FD Malin in 1948. A
1:28 hardcore Africana nationalist. His
1:30 government introduced apartheid in its
1:32 fullest, ugliest form. They classified
1:34 citizens into a strict racial hierarchy,
1:36 banned into marriage and segregated
1:38 housing and employment opportunities by
1:39 race. Black people had no voting rights,
1:42 no political representation, and no
1:43 economic opportunity. And from 1970,
1:45 they didn't even have citizenship. This
1:47 unsurprisingly created an incredibly
1:49 unequal society. By the mid1 1980s, the
1:52 average life expectancy for blacks of
1:53 Africans was only 58 years versus 72
1:56 years for whites. In education, the
1:58 government spent 88% less on black
2:00 children than on white children. And in
2:01 some sectors of the economy, such as
2:03 manufacturing, black Africans earned 71%
2:05 less than their white counterparts in
2:07 the same industry. But a system that
2:08 denied even the most basic rights to its
2:11 own citizens couldn't last forever. So
2:13 by the 1990s amid fierce civil
2:15 disobedience at home led by groups like
2:17 the ANC or African national congress and
2:19 international sanctions from most
2:20 western countries situation became
2:21 untenable. The Africana government by
2:24 this point led by President FW clerk
2:25 knew that time was up. The clerk eased
2:28 restrictions on black political
2:29 opposition and released leader Nelson
2:30 Mandela from prison paving the way for
2:32 universal suffrage at the 1994 election.
2:35 Mandela by now the leader of the ANC won
2:37 that election marking a historic return
2:39 to democracy. So aparttheid was now
2:41 over. But the task facing the ANC was
2:43 immense. They didn't just have to turn
2:45 over a new leaf. They had to rebuild an
2:47 entire society. And they failed
2:50 catastrophically. The ANC's whole
2:52 purpose was to fix inequality. But get
2:54 this. Since the end of a parttheid, the
2:56 wealth share owned by the top 10% has
2:58 actually increased, rising to a massive
3:00 90% by 2010. This insane stat puts
3:03 Africa far ahead of other crazily
3:05 unequal countries like Russia and the
3:07 US. In 2023, the average white household
3:09 earned around $41,000.
3:11 That is more than 80% above the average
3:14 for a black household. And the list goes
3:16 on and on. Unemployment has surged and
3:18 per capita real GDP is actually lower
3:20 than it was 20 years ago. Put really
3:22 simply, the ANC inherited the country
3:24 scarred by decades of apartheid. But
3:26 instead of fixing it, they ran it even
3:28 further into the ground. And after more
3:30 than 30 years in government, it is
3:32 ordinary South Africans who are paying
3:33 the price.
3:37 The thing is, South Africa speech didn't
3:38 just vanish. No, no. It was quite
3:40 literally stolen by the greed and
3:42 corruption of its own government. And if
3:44 there's one thing that best encapsulates
3:46 the country's descent into the abyss,
3:47 it's ESCOM, South Africa's state-owned
3:50 energy company. So, let me tell you a
3:52 story. The day is the 30th of December,
3:54 2022. Andre Deiter, the CEO of Escom, is
3:57 at the company's offices outside
3:58 Johannesburg. It was a normal day,
4:01 emails, meetings, coffees, but suddenly
4:03 everything changes. Doiter becomes dizzy
4:06 and confused. He starts vomiting and
4:08 collapses and is rushed to the doctor.
4:10 The diagnosis, cyanide poisoning. Doiter
4:14 survived, but the conclusion was
4:15 inescapable. Doit had become CEO of
4:18 ESCOM in 2020 and had led a massive
4:20 crackdown on corruption and fraud at the
4:22 company. And along the way, he had made
4:23 some pretty powerful enemies, some of
4:25 whom clearly wanted him dead. Escom had
4:28 gone from being the backbone of the
4:29 South African economy to the personal
4:31 piggy bank of its parasitic elite. The
4:33 company once produced 95% of the
4:35 country's electricity. But by 2023,
4:37 South Africa suffered from power
4:38 blackouts on 290 of the 365 days in that
4:41 year, costing the economy more than
4:44 175.5 billion in lost output. And here's
4:47 the thing, these rolling blackouts,
4:48 which South Africans call load shedding,
4:50 were the direct result of years of theft
4:52 and mismanagement by successive ANC
4:54 governments. Systematic corruption
4:57 particularly during the Jacob Zuma
4:58 presidency saw millions of dollars
5:00 extracted from the company in crooked
5:02 contracts and procurement deals in a
5:04 process that investigators are called
5:05 state capture. So let's take an example.
5:07 One of the biggest beneficiaries of
5:09 state capture in South Africa was an
5:10 Indian family called the Guptas.
5:12 Arriving in South Africa in 1993, the
5:14 Gupta brothers quickly established
5:15 themselves as some of the most
5:16 successful businessmen in the country.
5:18 Building an empire that spanned media,
5:19 mining, infrastructure, and more. Their
5:21 main mining interest was called Teeta
5:23 Exploration Resources. And here's the
5:25 thing. The groups just happen to be
5:26 pretty good mates of President Zoomer.
5:28 And they used this connection to win
5:30 together a contract to supply coal to
5:31 Escom totaling more than $235 million
5:34 US. In one of these contracts, ESCOM
5:37 agreed to buy $24 million of coal for
5:39 its power plants despite knowing the
5:41 coal wasn't even usable. And in another,
5:44 ESCOM agreed to prepay Gupta business's
5:46 $94 million to finance the purchase of
5:48 another mining company, Optimum Coal.
5:50 The deal made a fortune for the Gupta
5:53 consortium, which just happened to
5:55 include President Zuma's own son, who
5:58 took home $20 million from it. Like,
6:00 isn't that just an amazing coincidence?
6:03 The Zondo Commission set up to
6:05 investigate corruption under Zuma
6:06 estimated that in total 57 billion rand
6:10 or around 3.4 $4 billion was extracted
6:12 from the state through these dodgy deals
6:14 with more than 97% of this coming from
6:16 Escom and Transnet, the state-owned rail
6:19 and port company. And what makes this
6:21 unique is that the rot wasn't just at
6:23 the top. It was at pretty much every
6:25 level. Thieves literally stole coal,
6:27 fuel, oil, and equipment from Escom
6:29 plants with losses reaching more than
6:30 $55 million per month. The result of the
6:33 corrupt deals and theft was that by
6:35 2023, a massive 45% of Escom's installed
6:38 capacity was out of action due to
6:40 breakdowns or maintenance, wiping as
6:41 much as 1.8% off GDP that year alone.
6:44 The decline of Escom is a symbol of how
6:46 the marriage of politics and big
6:48 business pushed the country over the
6:49 edge. And it took South Africa from
6:51 being one of the world's largest coal
6:52 and energy producers to a country that
6:54 could barely keep the lights on.
6:59 The ANC's leadership hasn't just been
7:01 corrupt. It's also been defined by naive
7:03 economic policymaking that's worsened
7:05 the very problems it was meant to solve.
7:07 So when the ANC came to power after
7:09 apartheid, their main task was to put
7:10 the country's wealth back in the hands
7:12 of its people, specifically the black
7:13 majority. Their flagship policy for this
7:15 was called black economic empowerment or
7:17 be. And the goal was simple. They needed
7:20 to increase black participation in the
7:22 economy. At the core of BE is the idea
7:24 of a scorecard for firms which is used
7:26 to determine eligibility for licenses,
7:28 permits, and contracts with state and
7:29 public entities. And this is quite
7:31 literally what it sounds like. Firms are
7:33 awarded points across five different
7:35 elements, ranging from black ownership
7:36 to management to blackowned suppliers to
7:39 their overall public welfare
7:40 initiatives. And this policy was clearly
7:42 well-intentioned, but it's been a
7:43 spectacular failure both in its own
7:45 terms of increasing black participation
7:47 in the economy, but also in the broader
7:48 development of the country more
7:49 generally. So rather than transferring
7:51 economic ownership into the hands of the
7:52 black working class, it has instead been
7:54 handed to a small group of oligarchs
7:56 with connections to the ANC. By one
7:58 estimate, up to 1 trillion rand or
8:00 around 61 billion US has been
8:02 transferred to just 100 politically
8:04 connected individuals. So let's take an
8:06 example. And so if you want to
8:07 understand how this worked, look no
8:09 further than the country's current
8:10 president, Sur Ramaposa, who built a
8:12 fortune north of $450 million in his
8:14 post-apartite business career. He did
8:16 this by founding an investment holding
8:18 company called Shanduka, which held
8:19 stakes in well, pretty much everything
8:21 from telecoms to mining to real estate.
8:24 Shanduka got these in part because both
8:27 domestic and international businesses
8:29 needed black shareholders to get things
8:30 done in the country, which meant that
8:32 Shanduka became the partner of choice
8:34 for companies like Coca-Cola,
8:36 McDonald's, and Glenor in South Africa.
8:38 Meanwhile, being a blackowned investor
8:40 allowed us to secure discounted stakes
8:41 in lucrative opportunities. For example,
8:43 when Shanduka became a 12% shareholder
8:45 in mining group Assau in 2005, it bought
8:48 in at a nominal price of 127 rand or
8:51 around $8 per share, but paid only 85
8:54 rand per share, a more than 30%
8:56 discount. It sold the shares to another
8:58 BE partner in 2011, netting a juicy $140
9:01 million profit in the process, despite
9:03 selling the shares at a 23% discount to
9:05 the company's monthly average share
9:07 price, presumably to create a similar
9:09 arbitrage opportunity for the next BE
9:11 investor. And so instead of creating a
9:13 new black middle class, what be has done
9:15 is create a new oligarchy and to
9:17 facilitate the kind of corruption we
9:19 talked about earlier in the video. But
9:20 it hasn't just been a failure in its own
9:22 terms. It's been a complete disaster for
9:24 economic growth in South Africa. One
9:26 South African think tank estimates the
9:28 total cost of BE compliance is around
9:30 145 to 290 billion rand per year or
9:33 around 18 billion US. That's equivalent
9:35 to 2 to 4% of annual GDP. The need to
9:38 comply with BE imposes a huge burden on
9:41 South African companies both in terms of
9:42 sheer paperwork and by forcing them to
9:44 buy from blackowned suppliers who may
9:46 not be the cheapest or most suitable.
9:48 And because the compliance requirements
9:49 are less stringent for smaller firms,
9:51 that creates a massive disincentive for
9:53 growth. A 2026 survey of South African
9:55 firms reported 35% reduced net
9:57 employment as a result of BE compliance
9:59 while 40% reduced new investment and 50%
10:02 reported reduced reinvestment as a
10:03 result. The overall impact of this is a
10:06 collapse in the average number of
10:07 employees per firm as you can see in
10:09 this chart as well as overall investment
10:10 in this African economy. So to put it
10:13 really really simply be was a nice idea
10:15 which has ultimately become a major
10:17 economic distortion crushing growth and
10:19 deepening inequality. Okay, but let's be
10:22 clear it's not the only problem. It's
10:25 actually just the most prominent of a
10:26 set of market unfriendly policies in the
10:28 ANC that have held back the country's
10:30 development. Take for example the ANC's
10:33 1995 labor rights act intended to
10:35 rebalance the injustice of the apartheid
10:37 system. It gave employees and trade
10:39 unions extensive rights around wage
10:40 setting and job security and it was
10:43 great for workers but terrible for
10:45 firms. In the World Bank's now
10:46 discontinued global competitiveness
10:48 report South Africa ranked 124th out of
10:51 141 countries on flexibility of wage
10:53 setting and 129th on hiring and firing
10:55 practices. So whilst these laws are good
10:57 for people who have jobs, they have
10:59 suppressed overall job creation in the
11:01 country particularly for smaller
11:02 businesses and that means weak economic
11:04 growth and rampant unemployment. And
11:07 this it's where the deep irony of the
11:08 ANC's policy platform becomes clear. The
11:11 ANC thought that if they prioritize
11:12 financial redistribution then an
11:14 economic growth would come as an
11:15 inevitable result of that. But in
11:16 reality this focus on redistribution has
11:19 crushed economic growth and employment
11:20 in South Africa and harmed exactly the
11:22 people that it was meant to help. South
11:24 Africa is a tragic case of wasted
11:26 potential. The country is blessed with
11:28 extensive natural resources and a large
11:30 young population. But after years of
11:33 mismanagement and corruption by its
11:34 government, it has struggled to move on
11:36 from its dark aparttheid past. However,
11:38 there's also a recent case of optimism.
11:40 In the 2024 election, the ANC actually
11:42 lost its 30-year parliamentary majority,
11:44 forcing into a coalition with several
11:46 other parties. This new unity government
11:48 has enacted structural reforms to try
11:49 and turn the ship around. Chief amongst
11:51 these is repairing the country's
11:53 decaying energy and transport
11:54 infrastructure as well as reigning in
11:55 government borrowing. And these early
11:57 steps are starting to bear fruit. In
11:59 November last year, South Africa's
12:01 sovereign credit rating was upgraded for
12:02 the first time in 20 years. And in June,
12:05 it posted its third consecutive fiscal
12:06 surplus, beginning the process of
12:08 bringing down its debt burden. Things
12:10 are even getting better at
12:11 long-suffering ESCOM, too. After reforms
12:14 to clean up ESCOM and open up the
12:15 generation market to private
12:16 competition, South Africa sought zero
12:18 days of blackouts last year. The state
12:20 utility now even produces a power
12:22 surplus. And on the railroads, freight
12:24 capacity started to climb again
12:25 following market liberization with 20
12:28 million tons of extra capacity expected
12:30 by the end of next year. These green
12:32 shoots of economic hope are young and
12:33 fragile, but they demonstrate that the
12:36 country's problems can be solved with
12:37 time and pragmatic thinking. And so a
12:39 successful economic turnaround for South
12:41 Africa will depend on the survival of
12:42 this current more pro business coalition
12:44 to chart a transparent promarket course.
12:47 In 2014, then President Jacob Zoomer
12:49 claimed that the ANC had a divine
12:51 mandate to rule the country for
12:53 eternity. But as South Africans see the
12:55 possibilities of a prosperous future
12:56 without the party, the ANC should
12:58 remember that nothing lasts forever.
13:01 Subscribe to 2 and20 for more on
13:03 economics, politics, and corruption.