0:02 There's a lie the Germans started
0:03 telling after Russia invaded Ukraine. It
0:05 goes something like this. We Germans
0:08 because of the legacy of politique
0:10 naively put our faith in the precepts of
0:12 liberal IR theory which states that the
0:14 more countries do business with each
0:16 other the less likely they are to go to
0:17 war with each other. And it was because
0:19 of that faith that Germany intertwined
0:20 its industrial sector with Russian
0:22 natural resources in the hopes that it
0:24 would deter Russia from getting
0:25 aggressive with Europe. Sure, it would
0:27 make Germany more dependent on Russian
0:29 gas, but it would also make Russia more
0:30 dependent on Germany for hard currency.
0:33 There's one problem, though. The
0:34 Nordstream pipelines weren't built to
0:36 increase Germany and Russia's
0:37 interdependency. You see, the pipelines
0:40 weren't actually built to increase the
0:41 volume of gas going from Russia to
0:43 Germany. Physical capacity had never
0:45 been the constraint. Rather, the Baltic
0:47 Sea pipelines were designed to be a
0:50 replacement rather than an addition to
0:51 the network of already existing
0:53 overground pipelines. Because those
0:56 overground pipelines travel over Ukraine
0:58 and Poland. And since around 2004 when
1:00 Yuschenko became president of Ukraine,
1:02 Putin has throttled gas deliveries
1:04 through those pipelines as a political
1:05 tool, which in turn cuts off Western
1:07 Europe. The Nordstream pipelines are
1:09 there so that the German economy doesn't
1:11 get hurt when Russia gets into a
1:12 political dispute with Ukraine or
1:14 Poland. That's not an increase in
1:16 interdependence between Germany and
1:17 Russia. It's a decrease in
1:19 interdependence between Germany and
1:20 Russia on one side and Poland and
1:22 Ukraine on the other. If you go by the
1:24 theory of naive liberalism about how
1:26 trade reduces the risk of war,
1:29 theoretically what the Germans would be
1:30 doing is making a Russian invasion of
1:32 Ukraine more likely. That's why the
1:34 countries of Eastern Europe complained
1:36 so bitterly about the Nordstream
1:37 pipeline. It wasn't that the Germans
1:39 were naive liberals and the Eastern
1:40 Europeans were hard-nosed realists.
1:42 Rather, the Eastern Europeans saw it as
1:44 the Germans intentionally making a war
1:46 more likely according to their shared
1:48 liberal IR precepts, which is exactly
1:52 what the Germans were doing knowingly.
1:54 They just did it anyway because they
1:56 wanted the money. And it's easy to take
1:58 calculated risks with someone else's
2:00 country. The importance of that pipeline
2:02 wasn't that it made Germany vulnerable
2:04 to Russian economic warfare. The
2:06 importance was that it sent the signal
2:07 to Russia that Germany was ready and
2:09 willing to sell the Ukrainians out in
2:11 case of war. And that goes straight to
2:13 what the war in Ukraine is about. The
2:15 West and even the Ukrainian themselves
2:17 to some extent didn't take the job of
2:19 deterring a full-blown Russian invasion
2:21 seriously because they thought Putin
2:23 must have known somewhere deep inside
2:25 that Ukraine was a real country and that
2:27 a war to invade a country of 40 million
2:29 people could be made unwinable with
2:31 minimal effort. But the Russians don't
2:34 think Ukraine is a real country. So
2:36 unless the West pulled out all the stops
2:38 to intervene, they assumed Ukraine would
2:40 just fall over like a house of cards.
2:42 Deterring Russia would have required
2:44 something extreme, and no one wanted to
2:46 make that commitment.
2:47 The president is expected to warn
2:49 President Putin there will be real costs
2:52 if Russia invades Ukraine. We have made
2:54 clear to Moscow that we will respond
2:57 resolutely uh including with a range of
3:00 what we have called high impact economic
3:03 measures uh that we've refrained from
3:04 using in the past.
3:07 So Russia invaded Ukraine.
3:14 It started before dawn. Ukraine woke to
3:17 explosions around the capital K. The
3:19 monthsl long buildup of Russian troops
3:20 on the border with Ukraine has turned
3:23 now into an invasion.
3:29 But then a weird thing happened. To
3:30 understand it though, you have to
3:32 understand Russia's war goals. When
3:34 Russia first invaded Ukraine, they were
3:36 hoping to overthrow the government and
3:37 replace it with one that would be more
3:39 Luca Shenkoan, an action which the
3:42 Kremlin thought would be greeted with
3:43 either cheers or at least indifference
3:45 from regular Ukrainian citizens. When it
3:48 was clear that couldn't happen, what
3:50 then was Russia fighting for? Well, when
3:53 they're asked, they don't really give
3:55 straight answers.
4:04 They can't give a straight answer, of
4:06 course, because the real answer is just
4:08 too humiliating. If they were to just
4:10 cut their losses and withdraw back to
4:12 the February 22nd line, the Americans
4:16 would laugh at them. And clearly sending
4:18 hundreds of thousands of kids to their
4:19 death is preferable to that. But when
4:22 you're only fighting to save face, you
4:24 can do things like pretend you never
4:26 intended to sack the capital at all.
4:28 That losing the entirety of your special
4:30 forces behind enemy lines in a suburban
4:32 airport parking lot was just a masterful
4:35 gambit to distract everyone from the
4:37 real prize. Slovian's chromatoursque,
4:42 which they also still can't take.
4:44 Normally, this kind of ass covering
4:46 would not work. But in this case, in
4:48 this specific war, Russia found a
4:50 co-conspirator in its desire to push
4:52 this narrative. Ukraine. The Ukrainians
4:55 of course know exactly what they've been
4:56 fighting for. And it was at that moment
4:58 when Russia's attack on the capital
5:00 collapsed that they saw their ultimate
5:02 prize, the chance to roll back the clock
5:04 all the way to 2014. So when Russia
5:07 started saying that actually so long as
5:09 they didn't lose all the territory they
5:11 had won in the first few days of the
5:12 war, they were still winning the war,
5:14 Ukrainians were eager to agree that so
5:16 long as Russia still had a foothold in
5:18 Ukraine, it would still constitute a
5:20 Russian victory and therefore Russia
5:22 would come out of any compromise
5:23 emboldened to launch further attacks on
5:25 Ukraine and even other parts of Europe.
5:27 So hint hint, the West better send more
5:30 aid. This is not to say the Ukrainians
5:32 are wrong. At the end of the day, the
5:34 perception of power is power. If
5:36 everyone goes with the narrative that
5:37 Russia won, Russia will be emboldened to
5:40 do more stupid [ __ ] And for a while, it
5:42 didn't seem to matter. Ukraine seemed
5:44 poised to win outright.
5:45 Moving overseas, and Ukrainian troops
5:47 are making major gains in the country's
5:49 south and northeast, putting Russian
5:51 forces on the back foot.
5:52 Tonight, Ukraine is on the offensive and
5:54 quickly gaining ground, reclaiming the
5:56 largest swath of Russian controlled
5:58 territory since April.
5:59 But after the first few victories, a new
6:02 problem started to crop up. By winning,
6:04 Ukraine was whittling away its
6:05 opportunities to well, win. What was
6:08 working to Ukraine's advantage was that
6:09 the Russians were overstretched. The
6:11 Russians lost control of 7% of Ukrainian
6:14 territory, about 16,000 square miles,
6:17 and were forced back to the east side of
6:18 the Deniper River. But by being pushed
6:20 back across the river, the Russians
6:22 suddenly had 300 fewer kilm it needed to
6:24 defend and 16,000 square miles it no
6:28 longer needed to occupy. For any further
6:30 offensive, the Ukrainians would be
6:31 increasingly pushing a boulder uphill.
6:34 But conversely, Russia's in no position
6:36 to take advantage and strike back
6:38 because Russia is fighting a war of
6:39 conquest. It can't advance without
6:41 committing more troops and resources
6:43 behind the line in order to manage its
6:45 occupation, which is why since 2022,
6:48 Russia has launched its offensive almost
6:50 exclusively through barren fields and
6:52 small towns. Every advance mobilizes
6:55 more Ukrainians to fight because more
6:57 territorial defense units get activated
6:59 and Ukrainians in the West get more
7:01 nervous about the general outcome of the
7:03 war and are willing to take on more
7:05 risk. Even with America out of the war,
7:07 Russia just doesn't have the tools to
7:09 capture a city of a million like
7:10 Zaparisia, let alone hold it, even
7:12 though on paper it's already been
7:14 annexed to Russia. This combination of
7:16 forces just kind of lends itself to a
7:18 stalemate. The battle line is settled on
7:21 an equilibrium point where Russia and
7:22 Ukraine are equally matched.
7:24 This war has now become a war of
7:27 attrition uh where the Ukrainians are um
7:32 uh
7:34 paying a high price.
7:35 The Midwit interpretation of this
7:37 situation is that Russia has to win such
7:39 a war of attrition because it's bigger
7:41 and has more stuff. So obviously Ukraine
7:44 will run out first. But there are good
7:46 reasons to think a war of attrition
7:47 actually favors Ukraine. Ukraine is
7:50 fighting a defensive war which means it
7:51 loses material and men at a much lower
7:54 rate and it can more easily mobilize its
7:56 economy to total war since there's much
7:57 less internal dissension compared to
7:59 Moscow. Ukraine isn't already mobilizing
8:02 now because it doesn't have to because
8:03 Russia is also afraid of throwing in too
8:05 many resources. So while Russia's
8:07 cheering section in the media is sure
8:09 Russia will win a war of attrition, the
8:11 Russian Ministry of Defense is a lot
8:13 less confident. So, Russia tried to make
8:15 up for what it couldn't get on the
8:16 battlefield by using psychological
8:18 pressure. By which I mean, of course,
8:20 killing random civilians.
8:24 New burst of grief in Ukraine's
8:25 increasingly under fire capital.
8:27 Relatives mourn not at gravesides, but
8:30 by the newly covered bodies of the dead.
8:32 A 9-year-old girl, her mother, and
8:34 another woman killed on Children's Day.
8:36 And well, it works. Constant daily drone
8:38 attacks take a hell of a toll on
8:40 people's sanity. Ukrainians started to
8:42 doubt that they could make it through
8:43 the war without losing it long enough to
8:45 win a war of attrition, even while the
8:47 line stood perfectly firm on the
8:48 battlefield. So, Ukraine increasingly,
8:51 desperately started looking to the
8:52 Americans, not just to give them the
8:54 tools to survive, but the tools to roll
8:56 back the Russian occupation in Toto and
8:58 quickly. But the Pentagon was sort of at
9:00 a loss for how to provide that.
9:02 In terms of uh our their ability to win,
9:06 uh the first step in winning is
9:08 believing that you can win. You see,
9:10 here's the thing. At the risk of making
9:12 sweeping generalizations about a subject
9:14 about which I have no real world
9:16 experience, as far as I can tell, the
9:18 American Army doesn't really have a
9:20 ground war doctrine. On paper, it has a
9:22 ground war doctrine, but in practice,
9:25 America's ground war doctrine is thanks
9:27 to the global coalition, including all
9:29 of you here today, and to our other
9:32 partners.
9:33 Together with our partners, America is
9:34 training and equipping the Syrian
9:36 opposition to be a counterweight.
9:38 together with our partners with our
9:40 partners our partners our partners our
9:42 partners with our partners
9:43 find someone else to be the ground troop
9:45 so America can stick to closeair support
9:47 and logistics this means the US has
9:49 plenty of small arms and plenty of ultra
9:52 high-tech super weapons but very little
9:54 of the meat and potatoes in between but
9:56 that middling type of equipment the
9:58 self-propelled artillery the counter
10:00 battery radars the [music] short-range
10:02 ballistic missiles are exactly what
10:03 Ukraine needs and it's not like there
10:05 are factories around just waiting to
10:07 pump out more of them. So, the Pentagon
10:09 is nervous about giving away too much.
10:11 The advanced weapons can't be sent
10:13 because America wants to protect its
10:15 tech secrets and America didn't want to
10:17 send longrange missiles for fear of
10:18 triggering a Russian retaliation against
10:20 NATO. And I suspect the White House
10:23 thought Ukraine would be capable of
10:25 developing their own long-range weapon
10:26 systems that would let them off the
10:28 hook. Altogether, NATO was basically
10:30 betting on a strategy of bleeding the
10:32 Russians dry with defensive tactics
10:34 until Putin gives up. a perfectly
10:36 rational strategy so long as you ignore
10:38 the human cost to Ukraine. Trapped
10:40 between the pressure to end the war
10:42 created by Russian terror bombings and
10:44 the inability of America to win the war
10:46 for him, Zalinsky turned to a longshot
10:48 strategy to maintain the narrative
10:50 momentum of the war. He was going to
10:51 have to launch another daring offensive.
10:58 But where to do it? The lowhanging fruit
11:00 had already been picked. There were
11:02 really only two areas in Ukraine where
11:03 an assault would be plausible. the Don
11:05 Boss where Russia was throwing the mass
11:07 of its troops in an ongoing offensive or
11:10 the south [music] behind which lied the
11:11 land bridge that connected Crimea to the
11:13 rest of Ukraine and by extension
11:15 Russia's most important supply line. The
11:17 Ukrainians decided to hit the south. It
11:19 was the most obvious place to hit. The
11:21 Russians had their troops concentrated
11:23 elsewhere. The land is flat and the
11:24 territory is of vital importance. The
11:27 problem though is that the south was the
11:29 most obvious place to hit. The Russians
11:31 had their troops concentrated elsewhere.
11:33 The land is flat and the territory is of
11:34 vital importance, which means the
11:36 Russians were expecting to be hit there.
11:38 So the second the Russians retreated
11:39 across the river, they started building
11:41 line after line of defensive earthworks.
11:44 The more time they had to prepare, the
11:45 thicker the defenses got, which meant
11:47 for any assault, time would be of the
11:49 essence. But up to that point, the
11:50 Americans hadn't been training the
11:52 Ukrainians on quote unquote offensive
11:54 weapons. Doing it now would take months,
11:57 giving the Russians lots of time. But
11:59 with no better ideas to go on, Ukraine
12:01 began preparations for an offensive in
12:03 the spring. In the meantime, a quiet
12:04 bureaucratic fight started to break out
12:06 inside the Ukrainian military between
12:08 the commander and chief of the Ukrainian
12:10 armed forces, Valerie Jalusni, and the
12:12 commander of the ground forces,
12:14 Alexander Cerski. While Zillni was in
12:16 charge of the overall war effort, Cerski
12:18 was in charge of the Donbos front.
12:21 Cerski became convinced that with enough
12:23 extra troops, he could route the Russian
12:25 mercenaries of Vagner group in the
12:26 eastern town of Bachmann and push deep
12:28 into occupied Luhansk. But Zelusni had
12:31 already committed himself to a plan to
12:32 push south with only a small
12:34 diversionary attack in the east.
12:35 Reserving all of his new, specially
12:37 trained by the American recruits for the
12:39 main front. But when spring finally
12:41 came, nothing. The Americans were late
12:45 with some of the aid. And Zilinsky
12:46 didn't want to risk putting the army in
12:48 the position of fighting the first half
12:49 of the battle only to be left
12:51 empty-handed during the second half, so
12:53 he waited again against the wishes of
12:56 his commanders and the Americans. It was
12:59 at this point allegedly that Cerski went
13:01 behind his superiors back to Zilinski
13:03 and personally promised him that
13:05 Bachmoot could be a big showy victory.
13:08 that Vagner was on the cusp of breaking
13:10 and if he Cerski were just given some of
13:12 those specially trained American troops,
13:14 he could lead a breakthrough behind the
13:15 lines into Luhans province and route the
13:18 Russians on the entire east. Given the
13:20 delay, Zalinsky was probably losing
13:22 confidence in the original offensive
13:24 plan. But not wanting the bad PR of
13:26 calling it off, he chose the worst of
13:28 both worlds. He split his forces up and
13:30 gave a third of them to Cerski for his
13:32 Bakmood offensive. Instead of trying for
13:35 a defeat in detail, the Ukrainians would
13:37 fight under manned on two different
13:38 fronts. But for a second, it seemed to
13:41 work.
13:47 The mercenary company in charge of
13:48 defending Bakmoot, the Vagner group,
13:50 took such bad losses that its leader, if
13:53 Pragoian, began threatening other
13:55 ministers of the government and
13:56 implicitly even Putin himself,
13:58 culminating in Pragoian's decidedly
14:01 silly decision of trying to overthrow
14:03 the Russian government. Hours earlier,
14:05 Vagna forces seized the city of Rosa
14:08 Vondon on Russia's southern border
14:11 and then calling it off when he got
14:12 halfway there and pretending it was just
14:14 a sort of couplike performance art
14:17 protest.
14:18 By nightfall, Vagnner forces appeared to
14:20 be making good on their word to
14:22 withdraw. The Kremlin was also making
14:26 peace, saying Praggoian will no longer
14:29 face criminal charges and instead will
14:32 relocate to next door Bellarus.
14:35 The missile that shot down his plane and
14:36 killed him, however, did not stop
14:38 halfway. Russia's political system
14:40 remained stable, and Sirki's legacy
14:42 would seem to primarily be memes about
14:45 Pragotion.
14:49 With the hope of Russian political
14:51 instability saving the day dashed and
14:53 the main offensive force too under man
14:55 to break through, the offensive
14:56 sputtered to a halt on both fronts. The
14:59 failed offensive was not a particularly
15:01 big disaster when it came to the actual
15:03 balance of forces on the battlefield,
15:05 but it had a catastrophic effect on
15:06 Western public opinion. [music] Within a
15:08 month, support for aid to Ukraine
15:10 dropped 13 points and opposition rose 12
15:12 points, almost reaching a majority. All
15:14 the people who had tacidly supported
15:16 Russia before the invasion, but who
15:18 during the war had to keep their heads
15:20 down after the slaughter started,
15:21 suddenly started feeling safe popping
15:23 their heads back up again to start
15:24 spreading defeatism. And the foreign
15:26 policy blob in Washington, whose first
15:28 instinct is always towards power
15:30 worship, started nattering about how
15:32 Ukrainians need to be more realistic and
15:35 start thinking about compromises. This
15:37 damage to American resolve was then
15:39 compounded by Zalinski's need to explain
15:41 away the failure of the offensive to his
15:43 own people, which Zilinski did by
15:45 blaming the West, since, after all, the
15:47 West had been late with the aid and had
15:49 been dragging their feet on the aid the
15:51 entire war. But that sent the message to
15:54 Ukraine's tryhard cheerleaders in the
15:56 West that they should start ringing the
15:57 alarm bells about America betraying the
15:59 Ukrainians by withholding this or that
16:01 wonder weapon. a given type of equipment
16:03 would be paradigm shifting right up
16:05 until the point that the West delivered
16:07 it at which point just coincidentally it
16:09 would suddenly be too late for that
16:10 equipment to make a difference [music]
16:12 when in reality such equipment would
16:14 only have a marginal impact on the
16:16 course of the war. This game of two-step
16:18 is a perfect way to squeeze more aid out
16:20 of a hyper cautious White House. But it
16:22 also involved a lot of cycling between
16:24 false promises the war would be turned
16:26 around and false threats that the front
16:28 would collapse soon without the new
16:29 weapons. If this campaign to shift blame
16:32 to the White House had simply made the
16:33 relationship between Biden and Zalinski
16:35 frosty, it wouldn't be such a big deal.
16:38 But the focus on the catastrophic
16:40 consequences of Ukrainian collapse and
16:42 the panicky tone much of it was
16:43 delivered [music] gave the impression
16:45 that Ukraine was on the brink of giving
16:47 up. This was being done in the hope that
16:48 it would scare the West into giving up
16:50 more aid. But there's one problem, which
16:53 is that you can't control who hears you
16:55 say these things. If you broadcast the
16:57 message in the west that you don't have
16:58 the will to fight unless you get
17:00 substantially more help, you're also
17:02 broadcasting that message to the
17:03 Russians, thus bolstering their will to
17:05 fight. The second problem is that this
17:07 revival of domino theory in Europe
17:09 didn't convince Americans of the
17:10 necessity of bolstering Ukrainian aid so
17:12 much as it convinced Americans that
17:14 Europe was helpless and not carrying its
17:16 own weight. After all, why the hell
17:18 should a place as rich as Europe be so
17:20 vulnerable to a second rate power like
17:22 Russia? In 2023, it seemed every week
17:24 military analysts who had spent early
17:26 2022 predicting Ukraine would collapse
17:28 in 3 days were now assuring us with the
17:31 same confidence that Europe, or at least
17:32 the Baltics, would also easily fall to a
17:35 Russian onslaught after Russia was done
17:37 with Ukraine and that this was the
17:38 result of sort of decadent
17:40 post-historical complacency on the part
17:42 of the Europeans. In other words,
17:44 Europeans were just too gay and welfare
17:47 dependent to spend enough on their
17:49 military to deter or defeat a Russian
17:50 attack. and America is spending billions
17:53 to carry all the weight. In reality,
17:55 Europe's defenselessness is being just
17:57 slightly exaggerated. The arguments
17:59 mostly hinge on the idea that the war in
18:01 Ukraine supposedly proves that modern
18:04 war has become a nutritional slog.
18:06 Because after all, the war in Ukraine
18:08 has become a nutritional slog. And
18:10 Europe does not have large reserves of
18:12 ready or near ready fighting vehicles or
18:14 troops to break out in case of an
18:16 emergency. So, it can safely be assumed
18:18 Europe will quickly run out in a war
18:20 with Russia and fall back. The problem,
18:22 of course, is that the only reason the
18:24 war is a slo is that both sides are
18:25 fighting with last generation airplanes,
18:27 but current generation air defense
18:29 systems. Europe does not have a last
18:32 generation air force. They have a modern
18:34 air force with modern stealth
18:35 capability. They are not going to be
18:37 stopped in their tracks by a bunch of bu
18:39 launchers. And unlike Russia, Europe has
18:41 not neglected its naval power. Italy
18:44 alone has a more powerful navy than
18:46 Russia. Even a postamerican rump NATO
18:48 has a good chance of being able to
18:50 bottle up most of Russia's water-based
18:51 trade. And while Europe has been slow to
18:54 develop its industrial capacity when it
18:55 comes to helping Ukraine, that is at its
18:58 core a political decision. They're
18:59 simply prioritizing other things higher.
19:02 Europeans will suddenly find the power
19:03 in themselves to build much more quickly
19:05 once it's their ass on the line. This
19:07 European freeloader argument also
19:09 dovetailed with a new line of Russian
19:11 propaganda that had taken off in the
19:12 summer of 2023. In a June interview,
19:15 Vladimir Putin just kind of blly let it
19:17 slip that actually about a month or two
19:19 after the war started, Ukraine was just
19:21 about to sign a ceasefire deal, but then
19:23 pulled out at the last moment under
19:25 pressure from the West. And this deal
19:27 was, according to Putin, a more generous
19:29 deal than what Ukraine could get now.
19:31 You see, all Putin had really wanted was
19:33 a promise to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
19:35 He didn't really care about Ukraine's
19:37 internal affairs or even if it signed a
19:39 bilateral defense agreement so long as
19:41 it wasn't NATO. This meant, of course,
19:44 according to Vladimir Putin, Ukraine had
19:46 the option in the summer of 2022 of
19:48 ending the war right then and there with
19:50 good security guarantees and no real
19:52 obstacle to its European integration.
19:55 So, why didn't they take the deal? Well,
19:58 you see, the people who run American
20:00 foreign policy are congenitally evil and
20:03 love war for war's sake. And so they
20:05 sent their most subtle diplomat, a man
20:07 who can be trusted to always stay on
20:09 script, Boris Johnson, to convince
20:12 Silinski to walk out on the deal and
20:14 keep fighting. Needless to say, this is
20:16 not what happened. In fact, you can
20:18 pretty quickly deduce what actually led
20:19 Ukraine to say no by carefully reading
20:21 the description of the security
20:23 guarantee clause in the Russian offer.
20:25 In this formulation, Ukraine security
20:27 partner would be a consortium between
20:29 certain Western countries and the UN
20:31 Security Council with both the UNCC and
20:34 the other countries needing to agree in
20:36 order to approve an intervention in
20:37 Ukraine against any foreign assault. But
20:40 those countries would only be able to
20:41 intervene in Ukraine against foreign
20:43 aggression with the consent of the UNCC.
20:46 But Russia, of course, has a veto on the
20:48 Security Council, which means Russia was
20:50 under the guise of letting Ukraine have
20:52 a security agreement, awarding itself a
20:54 veto on any country's ability to
20:56 intervene on Ukraine's behalf if Ukraine
20:58 were to be invaded by, say,
21:00 hypothetically, you know, Russia. to
21:03 turn this into a story of the West
21:05 sabotaging a promising peace deal to
21:07 satisfy, I don't know, Jake Sullivan's
21:09 inexplicable first for blood, or even
21:11 just a story about the Ukrainians
21:13 boneheadedly turning down a pretty good
21:15 deal out of post victory exuberance.
21:17 It's perverse, but it lent itself to
21:20 something people wanted to believe, that
21:22 Russia was actually more reasonable than
21:24 it appeared, and there actually was a
21:26 sustainable ceasefire deal to be made
21:28 with the only drawbacks being national
21:30 pride. were it only so. This combination
21:34 of the failed counteroffensive, the
21:36 resentment of European helplessness, and
21:38 this new alleged proof that the war had
21:40 actually been unnecessary created a new
21:42 consensus that it was time to force
21:44 Ukraine to end the war. Whereas
21:46 Americans preferred to formulate it to
21:48 avoid feeling guilty, it was time for
21:50 America to stop forcing Ukrainians to
21:53 fight by giving them the weapons they
21:55 asked for. And that new consensus
21:57 created a perfect wayin for a more
21:59 entrepreneurial politician to pitch his
22:02 new foreign policy ideas.
22:03 I will end every single international
22:06 crisis that the current administration
22:09 has created, including the horrible war
22:12 with Russia and Ukraine, which would
22:15 have never happened if I was president.
22:17 as he told it now, Americans were
22:19 victims of a globalist elite and their
22:21 European allies who had started and
22:24 needlessly prolonged the war for
22:25 abstract ideological reasons like
22:28 democracy and liberalism. If Donald
22:30 Trump had been president, the war never
22:32 would have started because he's strong,
22:35 whatever that was supposed to mean. And
22:37 once he became president again, he would
22:40 immediately end it because he was on
22:41 good terms with Putin, which meant once
22:43 he got in, he could get a good deal. Do
22:46 you want Ukraine to win this war?
22:48 [music]
22:48 I want the war to stop. I want to save
22:51 lives. We're in for 250 billion or more
22:55 because they don't ask Europe, which is
22:57 a much bigger beneficiary to getting
22:59 this thing done than we are. I know
23:01 Zalinsky very well and I know Putin very
23:03 well. I have a good relationship and
23:05 they respect your president. Okay? They
23:08 respect me. They don't respect Biden.
23:10 How would you respect him? Why? For what
23:12 reason? But we have a president, Mr.
23:14 president that doesn't know he's alive.
23:17 This rhetorical stance was perfectly
23:19 designed to trick everyone at once. He
23:21 could appeal to doves by promising a
23:23 quick end to the war with a strong
23:25 implication that he would do it by
23:26 cutting off aid to Ukraine and force
23:28 them to make concessions to Russia. But
23:30 simultaneously, he could appeal to Hawks
23:32 by making vague appeals to his toughness
23:35 in a way that implied he was going to
23:37 use a sort of madman theory of diplomacy
23:39 which would scare Russia into making
23:41 their concessions. This shouldn't have
23:43 worked on Ukraine supporters, but the
23:45 growing schism between Biden and
23:46 Zalinski and the media campaign to
23:48 exaggerate the [music] effects of
23:49 American aid delays had alienated many
23:52 Ukraine supporters from Biden. And some
23:54 increasingly started thinking that maybe
23:56 Trump would be the lesser evil. Either
23:58 way, Trump would give Americans the
23:59 thing they wanted most in Ukraine, the
24:01 ability to not have to see or think
24:03 about Ukraine in the news anymore. It's
24:06 that urge ultimately that carried him to
24:08 the White House.
24:11 Is this a call? Ladies and gentlemen,
24:14 we are now projecting that Donald J.
24:17 [music] Trump will win the state of
24:20 Pennsylvania.
24:21 Now, it was time to implement his plan.
24:24 Or it would be if not for the small
24:27 problem that he didn't have a plan.
24:29 Do you think Donald Trump thought it was
24:31 going to be this hard, this challenging?
24:32 I mean, on the campaign trail, he said
24:34 day one it'd be fixed.
24:36 Yeah. Well, he was asked about this uh
24:38 why he said, you know, in 24 hours he
24:40 would have a deal and he said that he
24:42 was being sarcastic.
24:43 Trump's campaign promised version of the
24:45 plan would never work. Of course,
24:47 American aid doesn't give Washington
24:49 enough leverage to force Ukraine to
24:50 surrender and Trump was clearly not a
24:53 mad man. So any bluff against the
24:55 Russians was doomed to fail and Trump
24:57 cave to Russia pretty immediately. That
24:59 left the current plan of just trying to
25:01 ease the Russians and Ukrainians into a
25:03 sequence of partial ceasefires and
25:04 hoping that you can just kick the can
25:06 down the road where it can trip up the
25:08 next Democratic administration. But then
25:10 even that plan blew up.
25:12 You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned
25:14 for the opposition in October. Offer
25:16 some words of appreciation for the
25:18 United States of America and the
25:20 president who's trying to save your
25:22 country.
25:23 If you will speak very loudly about the
25:25 war, you can
25:26 He's not speaking loudly. He's not
25:27 speaking loudly. Your country is in big
25:29 trouble.
25:30 Wait a minute. No. No. You've done a lot
25:31 of talking. Part of the problem here is
25:33 that the Trump White House is torn
25:35 between multiple contradictory campaign
25:37 promises. On one hand, Donald Trump
25:39 promised to end the war quickly. On the
25:41 other hand, the populist right feels
25:42 that America has been taken advantage of
25:45 by the globalist elites and therefore
25:47 America must be paid back. But putting
25:49 pressure on Ukraine emboldens Russia to
25:51 ask for more, which makes Trump feel
25:54 like a sucker. Which means instead of
25:56 American pressure on Ukraine being
25:57 focused on one point of just getting
25:59 them to make concessions to Russia, the
26:02 pressure is diverted three ways.
26:04 Between
26:04 extortion of the Ukrainians for natural
26:06 resources, pressure on Ukraine to make
26:08 concessions to Russia, and pressure on
26:10 Russia to make concessions to Ukraine,
26:13 which just ends up canceling out the
26:15 pressure on Ukraine. At first, it seemed
26:16 like the square was circled by creating
26:18 a mineral deal in which Ukraine would
26:20 give up 50% of the proceeds from mineral
26:22 deposits it actually couldn't really
26:24 exploit anyway, giving the populist the
26:26 appearance that they would get paid back
26:28 all the money the globalists forced them
26:30 to spend on Ukraine. But then the White
26:32 House had to make the process so
26:34 humiliating that Zalinsky couldn't say
26:36 yes without jeopardizing his own image.
26:39 Why don't you wear a suit?
26:42 Why don't you wear a suit? You're the
26:43 highest level in this country's office
26:45 and you refuse to wear a suit. Just want
26:47 to see if you do you own a suit.
26:49 Yeah. Yeah. Problem.
26:51 A lot of Americans.
26:54 Senator Rubio, you've taken a very
26:56 different approach to the the question
26:58 of Russia. You've called Vladimir Putin
27:00 a quote gangster. Why would President
27:03 Rubio's approach be more effective than
27:05 President Trump's?
27:06 Well, first of all, I have an
27:07 understanding of exactly what it is
27:09 Russia and Putin are doing, and it's
27:10 pretty straightforward. He wants to
27:12 reposition Russia once again as a
27:13 geopolitical force. He himself said that
27:16 the destruction of the Soviet Union, the
27:17 fall of the Soviet Union, was the
27:19 greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the
27:21 20th century. And now he's trying to
27:23 reverse that. He's trying to destroy
27:24 NATO. Russia is also trapped in a bind.
27:27 It has a large swath of territory it
27:29 doesn't really want to administer and is
27:31 therefore valueless to Putin. But if
27:33 Russia trades that territory back to
27:35 Ukraine in exchange for promise that
27:37 Ukraine will stay neutral and maybe even
27:40 recognition of Russia's claim on Crimea,
27:42 they would essentially have to admit
27:44 they launched the war for no reason
27:46 since they already had both of those
27:48 things deacto. There's also the matter
27:50 of the Russian economy, which has
27:52 baffled some casual observers. With the
27:55 sanctions, the flight of the
27:56 professional class, and the massive
27:58 divestment of resources into the war,
28:00 analysts, particularly geopolitical
28:02 analysts, for whom economics is black
28:04 magic, expected much more damage to the
28:06 Russian economy. Perhaps unintuitively,
28:09 the secret to Russia's resilience lies
28:11 in its deep economic dysfunction. Russia
28:13 is a deeply unequal country, not just in
28:16 the sense that the rich are very rich
28:18 and everyone else is very poor, but also
28:20 geographically. The rich are
28:22 concentrated in a handful of cities and
28:24 a great mass of people eek out a meager
28:26 living in the provinces through a
28:27 combination of odd jobs and pension
28:29 checks. That meant when Russia needed
28:31 manpower in both the trenches and the
28:34 factories, they didn't have to get it by
28:36 cannibalizing productive sectors of the
28:38 economy, there was already a massive
28:40 bonus army of marginally employed
28:42 provincials to pick from. The money to
28:44 pay those people then came from two
28:46 sources. one seizing it from the rich
28:48 and two printing rubles which in effect
28:51 mostly squeezes value out of Russia's
28:53 small benited middle class who are rich
28:55 enough to have savings but not rich
28:57 enough to have it denominated in gold in
28:59 a Swiss bank account. In other words,
29:01 the war is providing Russia with a badly
29:04 needed opportunity to redistribute
29:05 wealth. In fact, in a country as unequal
29:07 as Russia, it's perfectly possible that
29:09 the quality of life for the median
29:11 Russian has actually gone up. But that
29:14 doesn't make the war sustainable. Russia
29:16 still needs hard currency to buy and
29:18 build weapons and to keep its currency
29:20 from collapsing. But the Kremlin doesn't
29:22 get enough hard currency from oil sales
29:24 to simultaneously maintain the welfare
29:26 state, pay soldier salaries, and
29:28 stabilize the ruble all at the same
29:30 time. That is without dipping into
29:32 savings in the form of its sovereign
29:34 wealth fund. After 3 years of war, it's
29:37 burnt through at least half of its gold
29:39 reserves. At least that's as much as
29:41 they're willing to admit. But Russia
29:43 isn't just sacrificing the comfort of
29:45 the oligarchs and the middle class. It's
29:47 also sacrificing the sources of its long
29:49 run growth. And if the war only lasted
29:51 three days, that would not be a problem.
29:53 But long run was 3 years ago. So while
29:56 Russia's been able to transition to a
29:58 war economy, transitioning back into a
30:00 consumption economy is a much trickier
30:02 and dangerous prospect. People have
30:04 higher expectations for peace than they
30:06 do for war. Putin will need all
30:08 sanctions off in order to get back to
30:10 normal. And Trump can't force the
30:12 Europeans to drop their sanctions. And
30:14 European sanctions aren't the only thing
30:16 the EU has agency over in this conflict
30:18 either. With the exception of the
30:20 Patriot missiles, most of the weapons
30:22 Trump might cut off can be backfilled or
30:24 replaced by the Europeans. At least if
30:26 there's enough political will to pull
30:28 out the stops. And while the Europeans
30:30 have been slow to reform in the past, a
30:32 flakier, Trumpied US might finally give
30:35 them the kick they need. I hope. Third
30:38 time's a charm, right? In fact, there's
30:40 a sick way in which Trump's election
30:42 might be good for Ukraine, and it goes
30:44 back to what this war is fundamentally
30:45 all about. You see, there's a lie the
30:48 Americans started telling right around
30:49 the time of the first Gulf War. It goes
30:52 something like this.
30:53 What is at stake is more than one small
30:57 country. It is a big idea, a new world
31:02 order. After World War II, the United
31:05 States created something called the
31:06 Liberal International Order, which has
31:08 long guarded vigorously and
31:10 consistently, and only now in the 2020s
31:12 are we in danger of losing it.
31:14 But the greatest threat on this front
31:16 springs from the distinct illiberal and
31:19 external actors who equate their success
31:22 with fracturing the liberal
31:23 international order.
31:24 The truth is that when it comes to
31:25 upholding international law, America's
31:27 contribution to upholding the world
31:29 order has always been scattershot and
31:31 inconsistent. Even when America wants to
31:33 punish a country for violating
31:35 international law, it usually settles
31:36 for a less than effective strategy of
31:38 sanction and weight. The one alleged
31:40 exception is the taboo on big countries
31:42 annexing territory from small countries.
31:45 The precedent set by, of course, the war
31:47 to liberate Kuwait from Saddam Hussein.
31:50 Saddam Hussein's unprovoked invasion.
31:53 His ruthless, systematic rape of a
31:57 peaceful neighbor violated everything
32:00 the community of nations holds dear.
32:03 The world has said this aggression would
32:07 not stand and it will not stand.
32:11 In reality, national borders have mostly
32:14 been self-reinforcing. In the age of
32:16 popular participation in politics,
32:18 rising nationalism, and cheap machine
32:20 guns, ruling over a foreign country
32:22 became more and more expensive over the
32:24 course of the 20th century. The people
32:26 are much less indifferent to who rules
32:28 over them than they were in the 19th
32:29 century. And if they don't like you,
32:31 they can give you help. They're now very
32:33 few things a power can get by invading
32:35 and occupying a country that it couldn't
32:37 more easily get through the more subtle
32:38 tools of coercive diplomacy. That's why
32:41 there hasn't been much in the way of
32:42 annexation since World War II. You can
32:44 see the problem in action today in Gaza.
32:47 Israel doesn't want to leave Gaza
32:48 [music] without getting some kind of
32:50 concrete win. But they don't want to
32:52 expend the resources that would come
32:53 with an occupation. So they have simply
32:55 settled for committing mass atrocities
32:57 on and off until the global community
33:00 out of some sense of pity just bails the
33:03 Israelis out of their dilemma by
33:04 relocating the people of Gaza for them.
33:06 A bailout that is almost certainly not
33:09 coming. A big three-way size disparity
33:12 like the one between America, Kuwait,
33:13 and Iraq could act as one exception, but
33:16 such an alignment of circumstances is so
33:18 unlikely it never happened again. Aside
33:21 from little Kuwait, the taboo on
33:22 changing borders by force has been
33:24 mostly self-inforcing, but it didn't
33:26 hurt America's image to take credit for
33:28 the kind of peaceful state of the world
33:30 in the 1990s. So, they did. And now
33:34 certain people have taken America's own
33:36 propaganda too seriously and think
33:38 American decline makes all sorts of new
33:41 conquests possible. The Russian theory
33:43 of victory in Ukraine is based on the
33:45 idea that the liberal international
33:47 order is real but somehow entirely the
33:50 product of American coercion. Therefore,
33:52 all they have to do is defeat the US in
33:54 a battle of wills. And once Americans
33:56 give up, the occupation of Ukraine will
33:58 go swimmingly. Well, now the US has
34:01 given up and Ukraine is still not
34:03 rolling over. The longer the Ukrainians
34:05 can hold out without American help, the
34:07 less credible their theory of victory
34:09 becomes, and the Kremlin will eventually
34:12 have to face up to the fact that they
34:13 have embarked on a forever war. This
34:16 would require needlessly a massive
34:18 sacrifice on the part of the Ukrainian
34:20 people, maybe bigger than they already
34:22 have, but what choice do they have?
34:30 And I just want to give a heartfelt
34:31 thanks to my patrons who've been so
34:34 patient. Next year will be more
34:36 productive. I promise.
34:38 Deckerhoff, Hans Peter, Valid user,
34:42 Marson P, Richard Roden, Tsunami State,
34:46 I solved AGI, White Oak, Tom Mgle, Bird
34:50 Nerd, Ishvan, Bojo, Stylized Integrity,
34:55 Broke, Geopolitical Idiot, Ari Eden,
34:59 Soma Lover, Christian Bickl, Matthew
35:02 Torres, Heatstroke, Arkrite, Cryptic,
35:06 Draone at Quillin, TV, SVPB,
35:11 The Dutch Musician, David Leak, Space
35:14 Octopus, Name Redacted, Arminius 317,
35:19 Soviet Baguette, Oblio, Voytech, Jüka,
35:22 Chris Maguire, Chris A, Flip Devil,
35:25 Devaldi, Leezy, Yusra Punk, Payton
35:29 Miller, Literally Bismar, Constantine,
35:32 Breov, E, Neomatrixism, Still Want,
35:35 Wilkkey, Happy Taffy, Turbo and Cababul,
35:38 Chris Robert, Colin Herrera, [ __ ] the
35:40 Cheney Foundation, Aaron Polari, Carl
35:44 Casper, Stinky Stan, and Joyer, Ian
35:46 Fredenberg, Rusty, Ren Walker, Arthur
35:50 Weedman, Politics Gaming, Yasin
35:52 Atanisol, The Business Goose, Panzer
35:55 Catat, Time is Fleeting, The Internet's
35:57 Number One, Herbert Hoover, Stan, Shell
36:00 Shock by Social, Lemming, N Gladstein,
36:03 Poseidon Buoy, Torture, Benji Smith,
36:06 Scurvy Kerr,
36:08 Insane Vladimir Rowan Munt or his evil
36:11 clone Peter Cody Rickman Dutch Tomas
36:16 Eric Patterson Fabian Garden Dialesian
36:20 Hadar Milner Propylene Mr. Lava Lava
36:24 Dracula Martin Kuran Hopsan Kian Hammer
36:29 Alex the Apologetic that his name is too
36:31 long Bobby G Bear River Vaker Archers
36:35 Black Admiral A Finn Bortal Lumberjac
36:40 Kustoau Dead Ass Reagan Arjun Vanalan
36:44 Professor Giraffenstein creation
36:46 scientist stylish hobo Calvin Garbatique
36:50 Durberg Ethan Jackson Ian Woods, Robert
36:54 Follow, Owen O'Neal, Sub Phoenix, Laala,
36:58 Daniel B, Demetro Pono, Mareno, Nick T,
37:01 Artixy, Travis Bennett, Video, Pablo
37:04 Gonzalez, Patrick Bender, ODST, Shacks,
37:10 Auto Expert, Auto Expert, Uncomfy,
37:14 Nathan C. Tupper, Revengeance Musical,
37:17 Jake Strereamer, Chop McCob, Glenn
37:20 Arrow, Jack Braggy, Kristoff Kasinski,
37:23 Love Letters, Daniel Frey, Jennifer
37:26 McCo, Gary Oaks, Girth, Matias Hoop,
37:29 Anthony Jin, Colola, Friedrich Art, I
37:32 Ratman, Christopher de Clerk, Deadmoo
37:35 53, Alexi, Rosie the Cat, Vault Breaker,
37:39 Tired and Emotional, Cop Creature Shop,
37:42 Dr. Males, texture, Jacob Thompson,
37:46 Display, GFX, Trashius, Poss Flint,
37:50 Chris Hansu, Beyond, Derek, Gabriel
37:53 Deards, Jerry Makovski, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
37:57 9 Peanut Supreme, John Miller, Yang Fun,
38:01 Game Warrior 010, Totally Useless, Dust,
38:05 Heartman, James Lynch, Crispy Bacon,
38:08 Burnth, Ay 665, Old Drippy, Anon, Bas
38:13 taboon zoo beers watch the anime
38:16 catpanet cuties null Alan wake that's
38:20 good broth arian and I redex garpinov
38:24 armen hinderberg telixv car no binn sir
38:29 s sha oscar foldout chair Joel Gomez
38:33 Gabotai Scott Beckett Zack Christensen
38:36 Jerome Rasky Horsecourse knowing better
38:40 Nate Rice Tedsville Bill, Kimma,
38:43 Spiderman, Aaron, Fog, Kitan, Jacob,
38:46 Lesey, Bigov, Ellia, Diana, Banana, and
38:50 last but not least, Kitten of the Yarn
38:53 Persuasion.