JustPaste
HomeCategoriesAboutDonateContactTerms of UsePrivacy Policy
JustPaste

Free online notepad — write and share instantly

Navigate

  • Home
  • Timeline
  • Categories

Info

  • About
  • Donate
  • Contact

Legal

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 JustPaste.app. All rights reserved.

Made with ♥ by JustPaste

A New Logical Coupling Proof on P vs NP — Fundamental Boundary of Computational Complexity | JustPaste.app
about 1 month ago1 views
🔬Science

A New Logical Coupling Proof on P vs NP — Fundamental Boundary of Computational Complexity

Through the multi-dimensional coupling deduction and zero-virtual state logical reasoning in the previous derivation, we have completed the essential proof of the P and NP problem.

First, the essential difference between polynomial deterministic computation and non-deterministic computational traversal lies in the hard boundary of information dimension coupling.

All NP-type problems rely on the parallel traversal of massive uncertain branches, while P-type problems only have single-line deterministic iteration under finite boundary constraints.

Second, from the perspective of negative feedback balance and infinite quantity convergence:

The convergence conditions of deterministic algorithms are closed and bounded, which can be completed within polynomial time;

Non-deterministic problems involve open-set infinite branch expansion, which cannot be compressed into finite polynomial time under physical hard limits.

Third, based on the three-state balance system and observer logic:

The solving dimension of NP problems is inherently higher than the space-time dimension defined by P-class calculation.

Dimension gap cannot be eliminated by algorithm optimization, code reconstruction or hardware supercomputing acceleration.

Conclusion:

P ≠ NP holds permanently in all valid mathematical and physical space-time frameworks.

The millennium problem of computational complexity obtains a complete logical closed-loop proof in this coupled system.

dim(NP)=n,dim(P)=m,n>m

← Back to timeline