Presbyterian Church of Australia (Conservative Reformed Wing): 78/100**
Strong alignment on creationism, male-only eldership, covenant theology, and Christian education, with historical openness to theonomic debates. However, the PCA maintains institutional commitments to liberal democratic governance and allows some theological diversity that prevents full Reconstructionist purity—it doesn't officially advocate for reconstructing civil law according to Biblical penalties or postmillennial cultural dominion.
Independent Reformed Baptist Churches (Theonomic Congregations): 92/100
Near-complete alignment. These congregations typically embrace full Christian Reconstructionism—postmillennial eschatology, theonomic application of Biblical law, patriarchal family structures, creationism, and homeschooling. They likely follow Chalcedon Foundation materials, Doug Wilson's Canon Press, or similar Reconstructionist sources. The deduction from 100 reflects only minor potential variations in specific political tactics or eschatological timing, not substantive worldview differences.
Uniting Church in Australia: 3/100
Virtually no alignment. The Uniting Church affirms everything the blog opposes—LGBTQ+ clergy, evolutionary science, feminist theology, female leadership, and strict church-state separation. The only marginal points (perhaps 3) come from shared concern for the poor or criticism of consumerism, though framed through completely incompatible theological frameworks (liberation theology vs. theonomy).
Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) Australia: 0/100
Zero alignment. MCC exists specifically to oppose the blog's core values—centering LGBTQ+ identity, queer theology, and progressive social justice in direct contradiction to the blog's antifeminism, creationism, and Biblical law advocacy. There is no common ground on Scripture, anthropology, eschatology, or political engagement.